Difference between revisions of "What are the main considerations when identifying content?"
(Created page with "'''Content Identification:''' '''Identification:''' • Learning outcomes and objectives o How does the AR-version of the course fit with the already-established learning o...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 12:56, 11 July 2012
Content Identification:
Identification:
• Learning outcomes and objectives
o How does the AR-version of the course fit with the already-established learning outcomes?
• This is particularly important, given that projects like SCARLET insisted that it would be content-driven, not technology-driven; therefore, the content needs to work in conjunction with the overall rationale for the original course’s development.
• Narrowing/Expanding:
o How many items are there belonging to the collection?
o How can the number be limited or expanded, while still retaining the integrity of the original idea of the course, based on the material object(s)?
• Are the records/objects digitised already?
o What is the availability of the objects?
• Special Collections, e.g., specialised handling and conditions?
• Completely digital and freely available?
• Completely digital with conditional use?
• What are other areas available for research?
o Are there additional, related projects?
o Are there links to different digital images?
o Are digital readings available, with links?
o Can links to library-stored reading lists available (from related courses)?
• Are there connections and links to the general university curriculum?
• How does the AR-version of the course connect to wider discussions of the material objects(s)?
• How does the AR-version of the course connect to wider discussions of the technologies in place?
• What are the larger aspirations/goals of the project?
o Are these aspirations/goals an extension of the learning outcomes, or do they go beyond them?